Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:41:47 -0800
Joel Koltner wrote:
"Joerg" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:7onr63F3pmh00U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxYup. But it's all going towards "obligations" already like paying six-figure retirements to public workers.
I wouldn't be angry at those public workers, though, but rather angry at the bureaucrats who allowed such arrangements to be made in the first place!
Here is an excerpt of how bad it is, you only need to read the first few paragraphs:
http://www.sacbee.com/topstories/story/2393100.html
It becomes very clear that there are people in leadership positions who do not give a hoot about taxpayer monies. This is why most Californians are against any more tax increases. Because they don't solve a thing, they only make it worse.
Jon: This is _exactly_ what I mean about the value of the media we have in the US. It is often the only way to unearth stuff and to make sure there's enough egg in some faces so things are corrected. Even though the paper I quoted is too left leaning for my taste I am still a subscriber because I don't want it to go under, it's the only game left in town. No matter what people say, in the US we are truly blessed with our media.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
"gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam.
Use another domain or send PM.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- References:
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jon Kirwan
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jon Kirwan
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jon Kirwan
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jon Kirwan
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jon Kirwan
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Jon Kirwan
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joerg
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- Prev by Date: Re: RTD linearization
- Next by Date: Re: OT: 1,700 UK scientists back climate science
- Previous by thread: Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- Next by thread: Re: ping Jörg: on what 'raw data' is
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|