Re: HP 10544 OCXO
From: Jim Adney (jadney_at_vwtype3.org)
Date: 01/13/05
- Next message: Robert Baer: "Re: Citation stating the maximum conductivity or resistivity of water"
- Previous message: mestapha_at_comcast.net: "FS: Fluke 189 True RMS Multimeter in MINT condition"
- In reply to: Rick Karlquist N6RK: "Re: HP 10544 OCXO"
- Next in thread: Rex : "Re: HP 10544 OCXO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:04:37 -0600
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:30:13 -0800 "Rick Karlquist N6RK"
<richard@karlquist.removethis.com> wrote:
>For NON-oven applications, you want to operate at the inflection point.
Why? It seems like this would just minimize your frequency stability.
Yes, I understand "inflection point." You explained it well, but
operating where the second derivitive is zero also automatically puts
us where the first derivitive is at its max (pos or neg) so the slope
is the steepest here.
-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney jadney@vwtype3.org
Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------
- Next message: Robert Baer: "Re: Citation stating the maximum conductivity or resistivity of water"
- Previous message: mestapha_at_comcast.net: "FS: Fluke 189 True RMS Multimeter in MINT condition"
- In reply to: Rick Karlquist N6RK: "Re: HP 10544 OCXO"
- Next in thread: Rex : "Re: HP 10544 OCXO"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]