Re: Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- From: Fred Bartoli <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 21:37:39 +0200
JensGraf@xxxxxx a écrit :
On 24 Mai, 12:41, Fred Bartoli
<fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JensG...@xxxxxx a écrit :
Hallo,What you probably see (probably because we don't know which SA you have
I tried to measure the noise of a DSP-output when no signal is applied
to the output. I measured the "rest"-noise with an oszilloscope. The
amplitude of the signal seems to be about 2mV. Then i wanted to
analyse the power spectrum of the noise. I connected the DSP-output to
a spectrum analyzer.
Now the problem is that i get different results when changing the
frequancy span of the spectrum analyzer. When i measure from 10Hz to
3.2KHz, the sprectrum of the measured noise lies at about -100dBVrms.
Increasing the span (10Hz to 25,6KHz) leads to a spectrum that lies at
about -90dBVrms. Compared to the previous measurement it is
approximately 10dB higher. Has anybody an explanation for this effect?
How can i ensure a precise measurement of the noise?
and which measurement you did exactly) is this:
when you increase the frequency span, you also increase the SA IF
bandwidth (most SAs have frequency span, IF and video BW coupled in
order to make the measurement in a 'reasonable' time).
What you want is a noise power density (nV/rtHz or uV/rtHz) and what the
SA gives you is nV or uV. For each analyzed frequency it gives the total
noise power that is within the IF BW around the analyzed frequency (hope
that's clear enough). As you increase span, IF BW increases and so does
the noise power.
To convert to PSD you'll have to check in your manual how the noise BW
of your SA is related to IF BW (it may not be identical, but often is),
and then divide the noise power by the sqare root of the noise BW.
Then the obtained figures should be identical.
Some analyzers also have the possibility to directly do noise PSD
measurements at some spot frequencies during the sweep. Check your
manual for this.
--
Thanks,
Fred.
Hello Fred,
i hope, i got you right.
But even if the IF (IF=input filter? antialiasing filter?)
IF = intermediate frequency amplifier. An heterodyne SA is nothing but a precision receiver.
reduces the
bandwith when a lower span is chosen, nevertheless the lower
frequencies must be in the lower span with the same power for these
lower frequencies are not filtered and so the power should not be less
than with a wider span.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Well, in fact I'm sure I don't understand at all.
If that would be the case, then the same phenomena would occure with
much larger signals but it doesn't.
Same.
I'm i right? Or do i get you completely wrong?
For a given spectral noise density, the wider the filter bandwidth, the higher the power you'll observe at the filter output...
....and SA just display this power.
To get noise spectral *density* you have to relate the observed power to the bandwidth.
For a discrete signal spectrum the effect is different: widening the IF BW just (artificially) widens the displayed rays width.
Have a look at agilent app note (AN150 I think) "spectrum analysis basics".
--
Thanks,
Fred.
.
- References:
- Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- From: JensGraf
- Re: Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- From: Fred Bartoli
- Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- Prev by Date: Re: Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- Next by Date: Re: Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- Previous by thread: Re: Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- Next by thread: Re: Measuring signals with spectrum analyzer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading