Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?

From: Kevin Aylward (salesEXTRACT_at_anasoft.co.uk)
Date: 08/16/04 

Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 07:09:48 GMT

Mjolinor wrote:
> "Kevin Aylward" <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:teMTc.142924$28.34654@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Ken Smith wrote:
>>> In article <w2ETc.141739$28.48707@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk>,
>>> Kevin Aylward <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> In fact, its the other way round photons *always* travel at "C",
>>>> i.e. the 3e8 max speed in vacuume.
>>>
>>> Yes, existing theory.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>> *apparent* speed. Atomic electrons absorb photons, go to a hifger
>>>> energy state, then after a delay, emit a new photon.
>>>
>>> Proving that it is really a new photon is a bit tricky. They don't
>>> have serial numbers.
>>
>> Oh, you mean like when the photon disappears (gets absorbed) it
>> actually runs around inside the electron for a bit, then pops out
>> again. Maybe.
>
> No it doesn't, it becomes a part of the track that the electron is
> riding on giving the electron a longer path and therefore a higher
> orbit.

These words makes no sense at all. A photon isn't a tract. This is
gibberish.

Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.

Quantcast