Re: eer
From: Bob Myers (nospamplease_at_address.invalid)
Date: 08/16/04
- Next message: Ken Smith: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Previous message: Peter B r u n n e r: "Re: Need Info for Tek 5103N, 5B12N, 5A18N"
- In reply to: FEerguy9: "eer"
- Next in thread: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:30:13 GMT
"FEerguy9" <feerguy9@cs.com> wrote in message
news:20040816042955.10759.00001298@mb-m13.news.cs.com...
> 4/23/02 I am not much of a team player, and have ZERO computer skills -
but I
> am an industrial engineer, who has thought very deeply about the subject
of
> energy for this planet. After many years of discussion about this, it is
my
> firm conviction that EER is no more impossible than a lump of coal - from
an
> energy density perspective. I believe that this is the inevitable
conclusion of
> efforts to provide energy for this planet. I hope my clumsy writing does
not
> distract from the point I am trying to make.
No, it's mostly your clumsy and erroneous reasoning that
does that. You continue to blather about this being possible
"from an energy density perspective" while steadfastly ignoring
that which has been pointed out to you over and over again:
chemical and electrostatic storage of energy are two very
different things, and you're comparing apples to watermelons
AT BEST.
You are, in plain and simple terms, not only wrong, but
utterly, aggressively, completely, pig-headedly wrong.
Your so-called "theories" are laughable on so many levels
we can't even begin to count them all here. You have become
the classic crackpot, so in love with your own thoughts that
your belief in them is purely religious in nature - meaning that
not only do these beliefs fly in the face of all evidence, but you
are actively ignoring such evidence when people try to
bring it to your attention. If you really ARE "an industrial
engineer," then please at least try to recall that little thing
called the scientific method, and subject your own beliefs to
it. It's not too late to stop looking like a blathering idiot.
> EER in Brief
It doesn't work. At all.
There, you can't get much briefer than that.
Bob M.
- Next message: Ken Smith: "Re: FTL (Faster Than Light) communications?"
- Previous message: Peter B r u n n e r: "Re: Need Info for Tek 5103N, 5B12N, 5A18N"
- In reply to: FEerguy9: "eer"
- Next in thread: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|