Re: eer
From: Bill Bowden (wrongaddress_at_att.net)
Date: 08/22/04
- Next message: Watson A.Name - \: "Re: Battery powered motion sensor current draw?"
- Previous message: Ken Taylor: "Re: satellite dishes"
- In reply to: FEerguy9: "eer"
- Next in thread: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Aug 2004 14:26:56 -0700
feerguy9@cs.com (FEerguy9) wrote in message news:<20040816042955.10759.00001298@mb-m13.news.cs.com>...
> 4/23/02 I am not much of a team player, and have ZERO computer skills - but I
> am an industrial engineer, who has thought very deeply about the subject of
> energy for this planet. After many years of discussion about this, it is my
> firm conviction that EER is no more impossible than a lump of coal - from an
> energy density perspective. I believe that this is the inevitable conclusion of
> efforts to provide energy for this planet. I hope my clumsy writing does not
> distract from the point I am trying to make.
>
> To those who would say that energy density prohibits EER, I would ask how a
> lump of coal exists.............
>
>
And how much energy is in a lump of coal?
How about a lump of Uranium for nuclear power?
If your eer capacitor can store the energy of a lump of coal,
why not Uranium? And don't say baby steps, or "small steps",
that's just BS. And don't say you can't do simple math, you
are an engineer aren't you?
-Bill
- Next message: Watson A.Name - \: "Re: Battery powered motion sensor current draw?"
- Previous message: Ken Taylor: "Re: satellite dishes"
- In reply to: FEerguy9: "eer"
- Next in thread: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|