Re: eer
From: CWatters (colin.watters_at_pandoraBOX.be)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: ScOe: "LCD pinout ?"
- Previous message: Don Kelly: "Re: Lumped element model limitation"
- In reply to: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Next in thread: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 08:11:50 GMT
"FEerguy9" <feerguy9@cs.com> wrote in message
news:20040925152655.23677.00001404@mb-m06.news.cs.com...
> Not smaLler - but with vastlY INCREASED MATCHING SURFACE AREA IN CONTACT
WITH
> OPPOSING Plate.+ By digging down to the moLECUlar LEVEl+.
Well you wouldn't want the plates in contact or you have a short circuit.
What would you put between them?
- Next message: ScOe: "LCD pinout ?"
- Previous message: Don Kelly: "Re: Lumped element model limitation"
- In reply to: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Next in thread: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Reply: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
