Re: magnetic field
From: Repeating Rifle (salmonegg_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Checkmate: "Re: magnetic field"
- Previous message: Repeating Rifle: "Re: magnetic field"
- In reply to: John: "Re: magnetic field"
- Next in thread: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 06:08:21 GMT
in article RAM5d.5110$5H2.4507@news01.roc.ny, John at John@john.com wrote on
9/26/04 9:23 PM:
> This is all a bit over my head, but presumably the first observer (the one
> who doesn't see the magnetic field because it doesn't exist for him) sees
> something else; whatever the second observer sees as a magnetic field
> manifests itself somehow for the first observer? Don't conservation laws
> say that elements might vary, but the total sum must be the same?
> Probably not...
Whatever one observer sees is what another observer sees when transformed ty
the appropriate Lorentz transformation.
Bill
- Next message: Checkmate: "Re: magnetic field"
- Previous message: Repeating Rifle: "Re: magnetic field"
- In reply to: John: "Re: magnetic field"
- Next in thread: phil-news-nospam_at_ipal.net: "Re: magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|