Re: magnetic field
From: Checkmate (LunaticFringe_at_The.Edge)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Previous message: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- In reply to: No Spam: "Re: magnetic field"
- Next in thread: softh_at_bellsouth.net: "Re: magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:36:17 -0700
On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:01:03 -0500, No Spam put forth the notion that...
> Repeating Rifle wrote:
> > in article cj8eqs$9kd$0@pita.alt.net, Checkmate at LunaticFringe@The.Edge
> > wrote on 9/27/04 12:15 AM:
> >
> >
> >>I think Heisenberg first developed that theory, but I'm not certain.
> >
> >
> > Planck introduce the concept of a quantum of energy in order to explain the
> > spectral distribution of black body radiation. Einstein and others were able
> > to extend the concept to explain specific heat and photoemission. Bohr first
> > applied it to atomic physics. Heisenberg developed the first modern theory
> > of quantum mechanics. Shrödinger formulated a wave equation that was much
> > more familiar to physicists of the day. The big surprise was that the
> > Schrödinger formulation gave identical results to that of Heisenberg's in
> > spite of appearing to be very different. The Schrödinger formulation was
> > much easier for making calculations while the Heisenberg formulation was
> > better suited to understanding essence of what quantum physics was all
> > about.
> >
> > Bill
>
> And I thought Checkmate was being funny. ;-)
That was the idea, anyway... tough crowd.
-- Checkmate Copyright © 2004 all rights reserved
- Next message: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- Previous message: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- In reply to: No Spam: "Re: magnetic field"
- Next in thread: softh_at_bellsouth.net: "Re: magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
