Re: magnetic field
From: Tom Del Rosso (ng01_at_att.net.invalid)
Date: 09/28/04
- Next message: Sir Charles W. Shults III: "Re: magnetic field"
- Previous message: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- In reply to: Repeating Rifle: "Re: magnetic field"
- Next in thread: Sylvia Else: "Re: magnetic field"
- Reply: Sylvia Else: "Re: magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:01:21 GMT
"Repeating Rifle" <salmonegg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BD7ED1F2.24867%salmonegg@sbcglobal.net
>>
> It is only assymmetrical because there are no magnetic charges.
> Magnetic charge does not appear Maxwell's equations. The symmetries
> or lack of them show up more strongly in the four-vector relativistic
> formulations.
Kevin said, "a magnetic field is created as an electric field changes,
and an electric field is created as a magnetic field changes".
I thought a magnetic field is proportional to the current, not the
change in current. Whereas an induced current is proportional to the
rate of change of magnetic field. That's the assymetry I refered to,
but I'm seeking clarification. Am I wrong or are we both right?
- Next message: Sir Charles W. Shults III: "Re: magnetic field"
- Previous message: FEerguy9: "Re: eer"
- In reply to: Repeating Rifle: "Re: magnetic field"
- Next in thread: Sylvia Else: "Re: magnetic field"
- Reply: Sylvia Else: "Re: magnetic field"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|