Re: Best Book on PID ??
From: Rhett Oracle (rhett97_at_marketbanker.com)
Date: 11/25/04
- Previous message: John Larkin: "Re: Best Book on PID ??"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Best Book on PID ??"
- Next in thread: Lasse Langwadt Christensen: "Re: Best Book on PID ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 20:44:10 GMT
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 09:45:23 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 12:28:37 -0500, Phil Hobbs
> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>I don't disagree that there are lots of similarities, or that there's a lot
>>of jargon in control system design that seems intended to preserve job
>>security rather than make concepts clear. (There's a lot of that in some
>>optics disciplines too--it isn't just an EE problem. Not to mention all of
>>anthropology.) If I'm designing e.g. a laser temperature controller, I use
>>Bode plots: one for each of several representative choices of ambient
>>temperature and thermal forcing. PLL design with nonlinear tuning is
>>similar. Not everything is that simple, however.
>>
>>Lots of control systems have to work in situations where an ugly settling
>>transient will cause destruction--from burned cookies and broken drive belts
>>to loss of life and property. There are very few purely electronic
>>situations (i.e. other than driving mechanical devices or large magnets)
>>where a poor transient response is that serious.
>>
>>Ordinarily, with an amplifier driving a speaker, say, you can have a few pops
>>and bangs, but no great harm is done, and they can be tuned out during
>>debugging. The nonlinearity is of a simple and intuitive sort, and there is
>>no complex coupling. There is also usually no external forcing, unlike e.g.
>>a motor controller which may have very different loads at different times.
>>It isn't possible to test every situation, and it's the ones we haven't
>>thought about that will turn round and bite us in the backside. Systems that
>>are uncoupled during normal operation, but become coupled due to faults and
>>transients, are a common source of this.
>>
>
> It's interesting that a lot of real-world control loops leave theory
> way behind, except for the fairly boring region of near-steady-state
> operation around null. The hairy parts, the transient and exception
> conditions, revert to art, instinct, and maybe simulation.
Just like life! Imagine that!
> I like systems like that.
Me, Too!
> John
;^j
R.
- Previous message: John Larkin: "Re: Best Book on PID ??"
- In reply to: John Larkin: "Re: Best Book on PID ??"
- Next in thread: Lasse Langwadt Christensen: "Re: Best Book on PID ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|