Re: Report this spam to: groups-abuse@google.com

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:01:28 +0800, Simon Scott
<simon_nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

JeffM wrote:

You just make yourself look more and more stupid
Simon Scott

It appears that you are the poster boy for stupid, newbie.
When you

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?enc_author=Z9PNsCQAAABqoQiSKE7FtxX8FbG-V2FHE9h5XwY2sTgADIUDhFQMf6hKwl2vgiIqpXHHo98KMRE
have another 5000 posts to Usenet,

http://groups.google.com/groups/search?enc_author=jWgiuhoAAAAaHl5AdntXWypjNXDBdYXmrbC9LgRjkB9B8JuzeYqLwg
your opinion (and that's all you are offering)
might count for something.

Mate, Id be more inclined to listen to someone who HASNT posted 5000 times
to usenet. Sad.


I guess my 26000+ posts must really seem sad... :-P

Tom



To find out how to get someone's Usenet access terminated,
look in the HEADERS (as Terrell did).
Here's what the OP's post looks like, including headers:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.electronics.misc/msg/6e8fedd0342313b3?dmode=source

Notice where it came from (Organization:)
as well as the Complaints-To: line.

At this point you should apologize to Mr. Terrell.

hahahahaha

ok, so Mr 'The Complaints-to header isnt a complete waste of time', why are
we consistently inundated with SPAM?

Please explain step by step how we ban the OP from usenet? Please, dont
leave out any of the imaginary details!

Is it something like:

1) Get google to pull his groups account
2) Fall into a parallel dimension where the guy doesnt go and get another
groups account/uses another usenet server/uses one of a multitude of
anonymous usenet proxies/redoubles his efforts to spam us into oblivion?





.

Relevant Pages

  • FAQ: Canonical list of questions Beavis refuses to answer (V1.50) (was Re: Email Forwarding, is that
    ... His response, if any, usually consists of replying to the parent post with a loud proclamation that his Usenet-reading software runs a magical filter that automatically identifies anyone who's making fun of him, and hides those offensive posts. ... If your Challenge-Response spam filter works so well, why are you munging your address, when posting to Usenet? ... If spammers avoid forging real E-mail addresses on spam, then where do all these bounces everyone reports getting come from? ... Since your headers indicate that you use slrn and, as far as anyone knows, the stock slrn doesn't work that way, is this interesting patch to slrn available for download anywhere? ...
    (comp.mail.misc)
  • Re: (Xnews) Memory Problems reading goups with millions of posts - Thanks ->>> with a P.S. f
    ... If bad spelling and incomprehensible syntax is what Usenet ... headers is not computer savy. ... want to say stupid. ... I also have a Linux ...
    (news.software.readers)
  • Re: World Naked Bike Ride London 14.6.08
    ... very new would use unmunged address on usenet. ... Err, see headers. ... reasonable anti-spam scheme. ... and my spam levels are ...
    (uk.rec.naturist)
  • Re: ping Prong was [Ping MickUK]
    ... Oh get serious will ya...I suspect that the worse troll on usenet would ... I'm gonna show you whose the retard retard! ... I post from ONE account. ... LOOK at the headers idiot. ...
    (rec.gambling.lottery)
  • Re: Gateway to python-list is generating bounce messages.
    ... The bounce messages are sent to you because you sent the ... You asked for email to be sent, by sending a Usenet post to ... That's what a news-to-mail gateway does. ... the one who's sending e-mail with forged headers is the one who ...
    (comp.lang.python)
Quantcast