Re: OT: a Win XP "trap for amateurs"?

Stanislaw Flatto wrote:

Michael wrote:
Last month I installed Win-XP ... for the first time. The last Win I had
experience with was v3.1, and a lot has changed since then, apparently. I put
the OS and about a dozen video card & motherboard apps. in a 2 GB partition of a
700GB drive; the rest of the drive is unpartitioned. Data is on a separate hard
drive.

Now the 2 GB Win-XP partition is bursting at the seams and I want to expand it.
But no!! Can't expand the OS partition, says Win-XP. So am I well and truly
screwed? Or is there a way to increase that 2 GB partition *WITHOUT*
re-installing Win-XP and all those apps? (^%$#! Micro$oft ... mutter-mutter!)

---
Michael
A Linux user here.
If you survived till now with Win 3.1, how come you went XP?
For me Windows95 was the straw that broke camels back when it told me
"Sit there, you idiot, we know what is best for you!". After years with
DOS and 'primitivski' Win 3.11, which needed learning to make it
perform. I was not ready to submit my computer to secretive 'wizards'.
Few weeks later Linux presented itself on my screen and still is the
resident OS. It needs the 'Linux steep learning slope' which for someone
coming from DOS+Win 3.1 is very well excersized.

So do what you want but there are choices around and you will end in bed
that you prepared for yourself.

Have fun

Stanislaw
Slack 12 user from Ulladulla.


I didn't actually "go to XP". Since it's available, I've used it to capture
some video. Just fooling around.

This XP install was on a brand new system that I built. The single system
replaces two old ones (circa 1997) and is shared by two people, each using a
different operating system on its own HD. Each drive is in a tray; remove one,
slide in the other, and boot. My OS's are OS/2 and Linux; my mate knows only
Win. This separate-drives methodology insures that my system files and data on
FAT partitions are never exposed to any nasties that creep in through the use of
Win.

I agree with your estimation of Win and reasons for not using it. I would add
another important point: Win is bloated and therefore slow. And since Win
rules, huge HD's, screaming processors, and vast amounts of RAM have become
common.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: a Win XP "trap for amateurs"?
    ... the OS and about a dozen video card & motherboard apps. ... Now the 2 GB Win-XP partition is bursting at the seams and I want to expand it. ... A Linux user here. ...
    (sci.electronics.misc)
  • Re: OT: a Win XP "trap for amateurs"?
    ... the OS and about a dozen video card & motherboard apps. ... Now the 2 GB Win-XP partition is bursting at the seams and I want to expand it. ... Few weeks later Linux presented itself on my screen and still is the resident OS. ...
    (sci.electronics.misc)
  • Re: Windows multiboot (aaargh!)
    ... >> The Linux boot floppy is a bit more tricky. ... So I tried adding cfdisk to a spare Debian Woody boot ... > I reduced all the partition sizes by a third. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: Linux, XP, Win2003 Server multi-boot
    ... Go to PC magazine's web site and do a search on "partitioning for linux" to see articles and reviews about partitioning philosophy and tools. ... Tools are now available in many bootable CD based Linux distributions to resize the C: partition of your disk drive to make room for Linux. ... I finally got the new machine - it came with one of those 'recovery' disks - and a 5 gig recovery partition that isn't supposed to be deleted. ... Once I feel I have everything in order - always lose something when I get a new computer - I'll format that disk and install Linux & Win2003 on it I guess. ...
    (alt.os.linux.redhat)
  • Re: Panasonic HD Recorders - What disk format?
    ... The earlier part of this is more about what may be Linux partitioning, ... might be possible to present the recorder with a larger disk already ... Most DOS/Windows utilities such as FDisk, Ghost, and Partition Magic Pro ... prompts to format it. ...
    (alt.os.linux)