Re: Repairing Lightning Damaged Tv's
From: Sunny (sunny_at_nospam.net)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: sofie: "Re: Vivo DVD player lost video output. Suggestions?"
- Previous message: Dave Botsch: "aiwa cd tray removal"
- In reply to: w_tom: "Re: Repairing Lightning Damaged Tv's"
- Next in thread: Sean O'Leathlobhair: "Re: Repairing Lightning Damaged Tv's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:04:10 -0400
Your incredibly comprehensive and useful reply is very much appreciated!
Thanks,
Sunny
w_tom wrote:
> Protection starts with the underlying geology. Best is a
> monolithic soil of clay or loam that is damp. Worst is sand
> or gravel. Also bad would be two different types of soil
> where the more electrically conductive vein is far from the
> single point ground. Example: they had a bathroom wall struck
> twice by lightning. They installed lightning rods. The
> bathroom wall was struck a third time. Lightning rods were
> earthed in sand. Bathroom plumbing made a better connection
> to deeper limestone. One poster in the Perennes once said he
> had to sink a 150 foot ground rod to get through glacier
> tailings and into more conductive soil. A rather extreme
> example that demonstrates the point.
>
> Establish the single point earth ground. For most, two
> ground rods driven well below the frost line and separated by
> a distance equivalent to their length is sufficient (Rods
> closer tend to act as if they were the same rod). Idea is to
> make this the best electrical ground on the property.
>
> All incoming utilities first connect to this single point
> ground either by direct wire connection or via a surge
> protector. Unfortunately, your antenna violates the
> principle. But there are alternative solutions. Three
> examples - the bad, ugly, and good (left to right) - are
> provided in figure 2. Concept demonstrated in figure 1. Halo
> ground that connects your earth grounds together. This could
> be a buried bare 4 AWG ground wire that interconnects AC
> electric ground to TV antenna ground. That buried bare wire
> makes all grounds equipotential as well as enhances the
> connection of earth ground to earth:
> http://www.cinergy.com/surge/ttip08.htm
>
> A US government publication further discusses the single
> point principle:
>
> http://www.pueblo.gsa.gov/cic_text/housing/surge/contractors.htm
>
> Equipotential means earth beneath cottage appears to be the
> same voltage no matter how massive the direct strike. We can
> install a great earth ground. But that may not be
> sufficient. So we surround the house with a halo ground or
> Ufer ground to also make earth beneath building equipotential.
> Homes built to contain transistors have a halo or Ufer ground
> installed when footing are pours - plans for good earthing
> must be started that early. This principle avoids
> complications created by varying earths. A complication that
> most homes new not worry about. But a halo or Ufer ground
> should be installed in all new construction because it is so
> cheap and so effective.
>
> Now that we have established a good earth ground, we are now
> ready to make connection to that ground. Every wire entering
> the building must connect that that single point ground.
> Ground wire connection (ie from neutral bus bar) must be
> short, direct, and independent. IOW (short) it must be less
> than ten feet. It (direct) must have no sharp bends; no
> splices. (Even 90 turns and lead solder joints on copper water
> pipes violate good connection requirements). It (independent)
> must be separated from all other non-earthing wires and must
> not connect to any other earthing wire until they all meet at
> the single point ground.
>
> Idea is to make that earthing wire low impedance; not just
> low resistance. For example, 90 degree bends could add a
> mircohenries to wire inductance. For earthing, that would
> result in a substantial increase in wire impedance.
>
> Using numbers: that earthing wire might have less than .1
> ohms resistance. But it might also have as much as 4 ohms
> impedance. Any increase in earthing wire impedance means a
> surge may seek other and destructive paths to earth ground
> inside the building. An earthing wire from bus bar straight
> through foundation to a point just above soil would be
> superior to an earth ground that routes up over top of
> foundation (through 2x10 or rim board) and back down to earth.
>
> Two other AC electric wires have also entered the building
> and cannot be earthed - also called hot wires. These are the
> most common source of surge damage especially to phone
> appliances that use AC electric - answering machine, computer
> modem, portable phone base station. The 'whole house'
> protector must connect from each wire to that bus bar. One
> minimally sized example sold in Home Depot is Intermatic
> IG1240RC. Others have been listed in newsgroup misc.rural as
> "telephone wire/lightning strikes" on 30 Sept 2003:
> http://tinyurl.com/q6g6
>
> A 'whole house' protector for residential service should be
> at minimum 1000 joules and 50,000 amps. Some, such as GE's
> THQLSurge (if I have remembered the name correctly) that is
> also sold in Lowes, is undersized and overpriced. Square D
> makes one protector that is undersized AND does not even
> provide joules in its specs. But in that list is another
> Square D product that is well designed - more than meets
> minimum requirements.
>
> Telco installs a 'whole house' protector that meets US
> National Electrical Code requirements:
> From Article 800.30A:
>
>>A listed primary protector shall be provided on each circuit
>>run partly or entirely in aerial wire or aerial cable not
>>confined within the block containing the building served so
>>as to be exposed to accidental contact with electric light or
>>power conductor operating at over 300 volts to ground. In
>>addition, where there exists a lightning exposure, each
>>interbuilding circuit on a premise shall be protected by a
>>listed primary protector at each end of the interbuilding
>>circuit.
>
>
> Article 800.30B Location.
>
>>The primary protector shall be located in, on, or immediately
>>adjacent to the structure or building served and as close as
>>practical to the point of entrance.
>
>
> Article 800.31
>
>>The primary protector shall consist of an arrester connected
>>between each line conducor and ground in an appropriate
>>mounting. Primary protector terminals shall be marked to
>>indicate line and ground as applicable.
>
>
> NID that contains telephone 'whole house' protector is:
> http://www.alarmsuperstore.com/bw/bw%20connectors.htm or
> http://www.bass-home.com/gotoproduct.cfm?item=91598
>
> A 14 AWG wire connects from that box to the single point
> ground. Again, it should meet these criteria rather than look
> neat: be short, direct, and independent. Too many telco
> installers want to square off the wire or neatly ty-wrap a
> ground wire to other cables. Wrong. That 14 AWG (more often
> is 12 AWG) wire must run independently and directly to the
> same single point ground used by AC electric. Both grounds
> meet at the earthing rod - the single point ground.
>
> Every incoming wire - all three AC electric, both telephone
> wires, and shield of any incoming coax cable from satellite
> dish - are earthed to same earth ground. As noted earlier,
> that antenna will require special attention. Now lets discuss
> induced transients.
>
> Lightning strikes the TV antenna seeking earth ground. Path
> will be destructive via household wires. And not necessary
> just through TV and AC electric to earth ground. That antenna
> wire may be bundled with other wires. Therefore that antenna
> wire induces transients on other wires or may even arc into
> those other wires.
>
> Same problem is also created by plug-in protectors. Lets
> say a plug-in protector is earthing the transient. IOW it is
> shunting a transient into the AC electric safety ground wire.
> But that safety ground wire is bundled with other wires. Now
> a transient is induced onto those other wires. Just another
> example of why plug-in protectors are not effective and can
> even contribute to surge damage.
>
> Idea is to earth a transient before it can enter the
> building. Not just earth anywhere, but earth less than 10
> feet to a single point. Campers demonstrate the principle.
> They were sleeping nearby a tree that was struck. Lightning
> strikes tree to obtain earth borne charges some kilometers
> beyond those boys. Some were sleeping perpendicular to that
> tree and were not hurt. Any boy who was sleeping pointed
> towards that tree had electricity rise up into his feet, pass
> through his body, then exit via his head. Body is more
> conductive than earth. Lightning will find every conductive
> path to those earth borne charges some kilometers away. This
> is also why multiple earth grounds on a building can cause
> lightning to find the other earth ground, destructively, via
> the house.
>
> When lightning is striking, stand with both feet together -
> the single point ground. Building uses same concept to not
> have appliances damaged.
>
> Incoming transients also applies to buried wires. This
> industry professional (another source of protectors)
> demonstrates two structures - each with their own single point
> earth ground AND both single point grounds interconnected.
> Buried phone line is also carrying a destructive transient.
> Phone line is earthed at building's earth ground before
> entering because even buried wires carry destructive
> transients:
>
> http://www.erico.com/public/library/fep/technotes/tncr002.pdf
>
> 'Whole house' protectors are only secondary protection.
> Primary protection is provided by the utility at transformer.
> But that primary protector may need be inspected. Some
> pictures of what to look for:
> http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html
> And rules for earthing:
> http://www.tvtower.com/grounding_and_bonding.html
>
> Protectors are only a simple science of protection. The
> art is in the earthing. More about earthing was discussed
> previously in two threads in the newsgroup misc.rural:
> Storm and Lightning damage in the country 28 Jul 2002
> Lightning Nightmares!! 10 Aug 2002
> http://tinyurl.com/ghgv and http://tinyurl.com/ghgm
>
> Should you wish to learn more, Polyphaser (another
> manufacturer of 'real world' protectors) provides application
> notes such as this one about single point ground:
> http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_PEN1002.asp
> and others:
> http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_technical.asp
> http://www.polyphaser.com/ppc_pen_home.asp
>
> Additional information in some MTL Surge Technology app notes
> at:
> http://www.mtlsurgetechnologies.com/downloads/tans/index.htm
>
> Bottom line is this: a surge protector is not protection. A
> surge protector is only as effective as its earth ground.
> Notice no technical references to companies that sell
> ineffective protection such as APC, Panamax, and Tripplite -
> and other plug-in manufacturers so often hyped by myth. What
> do they avidly avoid discussing to sell their ineffective
> products? Earth ground. No earth ground means no effective
> protection.
>
> Sunny wrote:
>
>>I personally installed the electric service at my cottage 20
>>years ago, in accordance with all Canadian electrical codes in
>>effect at the time. IIRC, earthing involved banging two 8'
>>rods into the ground several feet apart and connecting them to
>>the neutral bus-bar inside the fuse panel, and also running a
>>cable from the same bus-bar to the cold water plumbing. The
>>phone company installed the phone service, which enters the
>>building beside the electric meter, but I don't know if/how
>>they effected earthing. The only other incoming wire is from
>>the TV antenna, on the opposite side of the building, which
>>currently has no earthing.
>>
>>I would be greatful if you could explain, in laymans terms,
>>what further steps I could take to protect my cottage
>>electrical equipment from lightning strikes - since
>>unplugging doesn't work.
>>
>>I have no reason to doubt your assertion that protection is
>>always possible, but I am having some difficulty translating
>>your advice into practice.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Sunny
- Next message: sofie: "Re: Vivo DVD player lost video output. Suggestions?"
- Previous message: Dave Botsch: "aiwa cd tray removal"
- In reply to: w_tom: "Re: Repairing Lightning Damaged Tv's"
- Next in thread: Sean O'Leathlobhair: "Re: Repairing Lightning Damaged Tv's"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|