Re: Variac Brush
- From: "NSM" <nowrite@xxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 01:23:57 GMT
"Jim Adney" <jadney@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bh9pc195j89j3k5m29m3j2qthnrbsde850@xxxxxxxxxx
> I once saw an ad for someone who was promoting the idea of a bifilar
> wound variable autotransformer which was meant to "cure" this problem.
> Personally, it didn't seem to be much of a solution, and I've never
> seen them on the market. It sounds like an idea which was too hastily
> presented, and it must have died as soon as someone thought more
> seriously about it.
>
> Anyone else remember seeing this?
Nope. Sounds insane. After all, a Variac is really an autotransformer with a
LOT of taps. You don't want to short the taps together now, do you?
N
.
- References:
- Variac Brush
- From: geoff smith
- Re: Variac Brush
- From: NSM
- Re: Variac Brush
- From: Sam Goldwasser
- Re: Variac Brush
- From: NSM
- Re: Variac Brush
- From: Jim Adney
- Variac Brush
- Prev by Date: Re: Variac Brush
- Next by Date: Safely swap monitors?
- Previous by thread: Re: Variac Brush
- Next by thread: Re: Variac Brush
- Index(es):