Re: dial up internet providers
- From: "James Sweet" <jamessweet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:24:39 GMT
<captainvideo462002@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1128090672.990000.191030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well thats all well and good if you have cable to begin with but we
> still use an antenna for TV. I know some may argue that we may be
> living in the dark ages here but I have no desire to have cable. And
> just to set the record straught when my son and his girlfriend were
> living here they installed a high speed cable networked system
> throughout the house which we all used. That all went with them when
> they left and really I don't miss it. For what we do dialup is more
> than adaquate. Also cost is a factor for us too so that was the reason
> for my exploring the least costly method of getting connected in the
> first place. Lenny Stein.
>
I don't have cable either, used to years ago but found I never watched TV
anymore once I had broadband so got rid of it. My broadband is DSL over the
normal phone line, it's a bit more limited as to where you can get it though
since you have to be within a certain distance to the central office.
.
- References:
- dial up internet providers
- From: captainvideo462002@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: dial up internet providers
- From: Mike Berger
- Re: dial up internet providers
- From: James Sweet
- Re: dial up internet providers
- From: James Sweet
- Re: dial up internet providers
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: dial up internet providers
- From: James Sweet
- Re: dial up internet providers
- From: captainvideo462002@xxxxxxxxx
- dial up internet providers
- Prev by Date: Re: Epson Printers ...
- Next by Date: Re: Epson Printers ...
- Previous by thread: Re: dial up internet providers
- Next by thread: Re: JVC JX-S900 120 Hz Hum Bar Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|