Re: OK to always substitute low ESR capacitors?
- From: Bob Parker <bobp.deletethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:42:28 +1000
Hi John
I would like to see every single spammer placed onto some kind of
space vehicle and blasted into the sun. They are the lowest scum of
the earth. They've destroyed e-mail communication and made it
impossible for anyone to make their real e-mail address public. Have
you ever read "Thank The Spammers"? It's at
http://www.linxnet.com/misc/spam/thank_spammers.html and other
websites.
Having expressed that view which I admit is nothing at all to do
with low ESR caps or even electronics, I'd like to suggest that anyone
reading this who has a website takes a look at a neat little online
program which turns text into "character entities". When an e-mail
address on a website's coded with that, the present generation of scum
spammer harvesting bots can't see it. I hope it stays that way.
Cheers
Bob
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 17:28:53 GMT, John Robertson <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Hi Bob,
>
>Well, I've use two different tacts to try and defeat spam, one that
>works quite well is my return email address that I use on newsgroups
>(and it IS valid! ;-) - think about what the spammers trim
>automatically from posted emails and you will get it. The second is to
>use my email address (parts@...) on the web site, BUT with using escape
>codes inthe HTML coded part so the spam sniffers don't see it. Look
>for 'munging your email address' on google for this trick.
>
>With these two in action I only get about ten spams a day to my web
>site email address(parts@...) and none (0) to the newsgroup return
>address.
>
>My regular one (JRR@...) I get a couple of hundred a day (sigh) but
>that is because it is in WAY too many address books around the world -
>but Eudora catches 95% of spam that comes in that way, leaving me
>simply to have to review the junk (ten or so a day) that gets to the
>inbox. If I opened a new address I'm sure it would not get much at all
>using these procedures.
>
>Oh, and I use a MAC running OS X so viruses, spyware, and worms are of
>no concern at all.
>
>John :-#)#
.
- References:
- Re: OK to always substitute low ESR capacitors?
- From: John Robertson
- Re: OK to always substitute low ESR capacitors?
- Prev by Date: Old 6 transistor Radio repair
- Next by Date: Re: if the overall keyboard is not working
- Previous by thread: Re: OK to always substitute low ESR capacitors?
- Next by thread: Re: PCB testing or repairing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
