Re: OT: tvs and fires - article
- From: James Sweet <jamessweet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 18:33:48 GMT
CJT wrote:
Ken Weitzel wrote:
Tom MacIntyre wrote:
What I find hard to believe is this whole thing, based on isolated incidents. A huge percentage of all homes in North America at any given time have one or more TV's in standby mode...how many fires are we expecting?
Tom
Hi Tom...
What floors me is how incredibly lazy we've somehow become. :)
Apparently we can't once or twice a day walk all the way to the set and turn on a power button. Too far, too hard. Can't go any further than the remote. Or maybe can't wait the extra one or two seconds :)
What ever happened to the olden days "holiday" switch?
And has anyone considered the tremendous energy waste of millions of sets each needlessly burning up 10 or 20 watts?
Yes. It's a LOT of energy.
Granted the old "instant on" tube sets used a comparatively large amount of power in standby, but has anyone measured the the standby draw of a modern set? Now I may just have to do that, I suspect it takes very little power to keep the microcontroller running, obviously some use a better design than others though.
.
- References:
- OT: tvs and fires - article
- From: b
- Re: OT: tvs and fires - article
- From: Jumpster Jiver
- Re: OT: tvs and fires - article
- From: simon hanlon
- Re: OT: tvs and fires - article
- From: Tom MacIntyre
- Re: OT: tvs and fires - article
- From: CJT
- OT: tvs and fires - article
- Prev by Date: Re: ethernet card
- Next by Date: Re: ethernet card
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: tvs and fires - article
- Next by thread: CTC-169CF5
- Index(es):
Loading