Re: ethernet card
- From: CJT <abujlehc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:23:08 GMT
P. Thompson wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005, CJT wrote:
Figure 7 of the cisco site shows all four pairs in use.CJT wrote:
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
In article <436CF621.70004@xxxxxxxxxxx>, CJT wrote:
You sure about that? My recollection is that Gigabit uses all 8.
I'll check, I've don't think so, but occasionaly I'm wrong. :-)
I Google'd for it, and this is the first reference I found. But I'm fairly certain I've read it elsewhere, too, including in a textbook on networking:
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/231/2
FWIW, here's a cite with a little more impressive credentials:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk214/tech_digest09186a0080091a86.html
Precisely my point.
--- Lord, protect me from those to whom you speak directly All salute the new age, and I hope nobody escapes
-- The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che...@xxxxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ethernet card
- From: James Sweet
- Re: ethernet card
- References:
- Re: ethernet card
- From: gb
- Re: ethernet card
- From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson
- Re: ethernet card
- From: CJT
- Re: ethernet card
- From: Geoffrey S. Mendelson
- Re: ethernet card
- From: CJT
- Re: ethernet card
- From: CJT
- Re: ethernet card
- From: P. Thompson
- Re: ethernet card
- Prev by Date: Re: 50 hz timer motor
- Next by Date: Re: BAH! New (2 me) panasonic tube fading in and out
- Previous by thread: Re: ethernet card
- Next by thread: Re: ethernet card
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|