Re: tek part substitution reference
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Nov 2005 15:22:34 GMT
yzordderrex@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:1131591354.421160.135050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Thanks for the condescending attitude (and useless information) there
> Jim.
>
> I have a service manual.
> I've read the portions that I believe cover the problem.
> I ordered a 20Mhz scope today as a backup and to fix the Tek.
>
> So if you got a web page that might have a cross to the Tek part
> numbers found in the SERVICE MANUAL then post it. Otherwise please try
> to be a little more polite. Sorry for the tone, but I pluck chickens
> for 8 hours a day. I just like to enjoy my radio hobby after hours.
>
> regards,
> Bob
>
The FIRST item on a Google serch for "tek part number cross reference";
http://www.sphere.bc.ca/test/tekequiv.html
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: tek part substitution reference
- From: yzordderrex
- Re: tek part substitution reference
- References:
- Re: tek part substitution reference
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: tek part substitution reference
- From: yzordderrex
- Re: tek part substitution reference
- Prev by Date: Re: New success: Banging TV brings picture back. Any insight?
- Next by Date: Re: Amateur FTIR
- Previous by thread: Re: tek part substitution reference
- Next by thread: Re: tek part substitution reference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|