Re: TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- From: Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 16:48:04 +1000
On 17 May 2006 09:02:42 -0700, "bud" <budmalcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> put
finger to keyboard and composed:
Does anyone think it would be ok to sub a TDA6107 in place of a TDA6108
or will it turn into a smoke and flame show?
http://pdf1.alldata***.com/data***-pdf/view/19405/PHILIPS/TDA6108.html
http://pdf1.alldata***.com/data***-pdf/view/86332/PHILIPS/TDA6107JF.html
The application circuits appear identical. The only significant
difference appears to be that the TDA1067 has a poorer frequency
response and a slower slew rate. I think the subsitution will be OK
but you may see some loss of detail in the image. I'd give it a go,
but you make your own choice. :-)
- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- From: bud
- Re: TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- References:
- TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- From: bud
- TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- Prev by Date: Re: More info....
- Next by Date: How do I get into netgear router?
- Previous by thread: TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- Next by thread: Re: TDA6108 vs TDA6107
- Index(es):