Re: Anyone NEED these test jigs?


"Michael Black" <et472@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eveiqn$ll0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Charles Schuler" (charleschuler@xxxxxxxxxxx) writes:
My Dear Michael:

You are obviously on potent meds or alcohol or both.

Your lack of coherence is alarming. Please check with your primary care
physician.

Charlie Brown

(p.s. Lucy agees)


Since you don't quote, it's hard to be sure which post you are replying
to.

But however much I tend to think the jigs may not be of much value
here, I should point out that Michael has said he's suffering something
at the moment and is taking something for it, so that comment really
is innapropriate.

I find several things inappropriate in this thread, including several of
Michael's comments. My origninal reply was an opinion and was not dripping
in vitriol, as where many subsequent posts.

I don't follow (read) Michael's posts. I know nothing about him and have no
interest in him. If he has a problem, then God bless him and keep him and
heal him ... it is beyond my powers to do so.

Apparently, though, Michael digs up stuff on me ... the "retired" slam is an
obvious off-the-wall, left-hand denegration of one's opponent in a debate
used when one is running out of logical and cogent options.

Look, I am not going to be swayed by any of this. I gave an opinion,
according to a solicitation for any opinion, and will just cary on. That's
how Usenet works. One posts a query and one must expect repsonses that they
feel are inappropriate. They can respond with hubrage and then should
expect, and live with, in-kind responses, or go to a bar and beat the hell
out of those who disagree.

The local playground and local bar behaviors are much evident here.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Vexatious Litigant
    ... That is entirely you opinion. ... Yes but you post as if you are posting fact when all it's only 'your ... Hell you even respond to posts about me. ... I have already explained to you many times I only cancel my posts on ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Vexatious Litigant
    ... That is entirely you opinion. ... Hell you even respond to posts about me. ... You put it up as an apparent reason, in order to mask the real reason, ... task you would have getting rid of them on google, ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: possible to connect 2 graphs?
    ... > the past to the recommendations he was given about his posts and didn't ... "The March Hare" doesn't really lend itself to being ... >> opinion doesn't carry any more weight than anyone else's. ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)
  • Re: Jill Short......Come On Down
    ... cannot have a stronger opinion] too much. ... action, would destroy a livelihood. ... original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author ... unprofessional manner to people on this ng....and if the posts were so ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)
  • Re: Jill Short......Come On Down
    ... My opinion only, but to destroy a persons livelihood because of what they said on Usenet, is nothing more than controlling what another person does. ... original | Report Abuse | Find messages by this author ... hypocrisy of preachers and the church. ... unprofessional manner to people on this ng....and if the posts were so ...
    (alt.support.chronic-pain)