Re: Bridge Failures ...
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 06:33:11 +0100
"hr(bob) hofmann@xxxxxxx" wrote:
It seems like Graham's been pretty well subdued by most of the
commenters who see a reasonable number of reasons why one diodes on
one side of the bridge might fail more often. Not that it couldn't be
a statistical anomaly, but there are other possibilities too, and I
hope Graham now understands his trashing response was out of line. We
need helpful comments, not trashing ones.
Most of the comments that suggested a relationship seemed to be clutching at
straws quite frankly.
The best explanation I saw was the influence of large areas of copper foil on the
pcb. That will help to cool the diode on that 'leg' and a cool diode is less
likely to fail than a hot one.
However, the idea that there's always more foil on the negative terminal seems
spurious to me. I certainly don't lay out pcbs like that. Your own experience may
differ of course.
Graham
.
- References:
- Bridge Failures ...
- From: Arfa Daily
- Re: Bridge Failures ...
- From: msg
- Re: Bridge Failures ...
- From: Andrew Erickson
- Re: Bridge Failures ...
- From: Arfa Daily
- Re: Bridge Failures ...
- From: hr(bob) hofmann@xxxxxxx
- Bridge Failures ...
- Prev by Date: Re: Bridge Failures ...
- Next by Date: Re: Bridge Failures ...
- Previous by thread: Re: Bridge Failures ...
- Next by thread: Re: Bridge Failures ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|