Re: Old Zenith safety caps.
- From: clifto <clifto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:18:03 -0500
ZZactly@xxxxxxx wrote:
That's when it really pays to understand reactive scanning, although
these modern pincushion circuits befuddle me. Even a CTC169, my logic
says when the .056uF opens the picture should be too narrow. Then you
got Sonys doing the opposite of what you think a given bad component
should cause because of feedback. Then you have coils with magnets in
them, geez ! See my thread about a new profession lol.
If circuits always failed in ways you'd expect them to fail, then it
wouldn't be any fun any more, would it?
--
If you really believe carbon dioxide causes global warming,
you should stop exhaling.
.
- References:
- Old Zenith safety caps.
- From: captainvideo462002@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Old Zenith safety caps.
- From: Edd Whatley
- Re: Old Zenith safety caps.
- From: captainvideo462002@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Old Zenith safety caps.
- From: ZZactly
- Old Zenith safety caps.
- Prev by Date: Where are You ...?
- Next by Date: Re: Problem with IBM T21 notebook on-topic here?
- Previous by thread: Re: Old Zenith safety caps.
- Next by thread: Re: Old Zenith safety caps.
- Index(es):