Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- From: msg <msg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:52:16 -0600
James Sweet wrote:
"Michae A. Terrell" <mike.temrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fq0v10$ve6$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
"James Sweet" <jamessweet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:JnCwj.7711$Sw6.2121@xxxxxxxxxxx
"msg" <msg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13s4uia844u9fa2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Check the headers of the posts from "Michael A. Terrell" in the last few
hours;
they originate from different user agent (IE vs. Moz), providers (aioe.org
vs supernews)
and networks than is usual for Michael. They may be forged.
Ya think?
I'd say the content was a dead givaway.
You mean my posts have no value at all to the readers?
I mean that you don't normally reply to a bunch of stuff with "You have no brain"
Perhaps I should have said lack of content.
You just replied to the forger, check the headers ;-)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- From: James Sweet
- Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- References:
- Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- From: msg
- Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- From: James Sweet
- Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- From: James Sweet
- Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- Prev by Date: Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- Next by Date: Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- Previous by thread: Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- Next by thread: Re: Michael Terrell posts may be forged
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
