Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: default <default@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:48:30 -0400
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 16:41:22 GMT, "James Sweet"
<jamessweet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
True enough the only interesting thing is the flat panel emitting
"default" <default@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1207746075_295@xxxxxxxx
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:37:44 GMT, "James Sweet"
<jamessweet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Who
knows what else might be on the horizon.
Aluminum foil lamps outshine incandescent lights
http://www.news.uiuc.edu/news/07/0604lamps.html
That's interesting, however it states it uses a gas plasma to excite a
phosphor coating, so for all practical purposes it's a fluorescent lamp and
will have the same light characteristics.
surface and "require no ballast, reflector or heavy metal housing."
No ballast seems unlikely; what does limit current?
Both Phillips and G.E. have announced plans to introduce incandescent
lamps by ~2010 that "will have efficiencies on a par with CFL's."
They also claim a better quality of light - which has to mean that
they are using waste IR to heat the emitter.
I figure they probably could have developed this years ago if they had
the incentive. With CFL's costing ~$1-$5 each, and government
mandates they now have the incentive. A bulb will be cheaper to make
unless something else comes along to change things. Perhaps they
intend to try to force a mandate that CFL's be outlawed due to the
mercury they contain.
Politics, marketing hype, and emotion - hard to design around those.
We see how well the "Hydrogen Economy" (most plentiful fuel in the
universe) is taking off . . . or the alcohol subsidies which have the
effect of raising food prices and may never break even, if corn is the
only viable feedstock in the US.
--
----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
.
- References:
- Light bulb power saver
- From: Silver Surfer
- Re: Light bulb power saver
- From: default
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: Silver Surfer
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: James Sweet
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: default
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: James Sweet
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: William Sommerwerck
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: James Sweet
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: default
- Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- From: James Sweet
- Light bulb power saver
- Prev by Date: Re: IDTech monitor IBM
- Next by Date: Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- Previous by thread: Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- Next by thread: Re: Light bulb power saver (and now the rest of the story)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|