Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: msg <msg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:40:05 -0500
Arfa Daily wrote:
<snip>
Going back to the step potential question, thanks all for your thoughts. You all seem to understand it pretty much as I (thought I) did. I think that the concentric circles thing is just an attempt at simplification so that it makes for an 'interesting' and understandable in principle article in a company mag for general reading by everyone i.e. office staff, managers, those in the field and so on. I think we'll settle on there being a potential gradient between the downed cable's point of contact with the ground, and the points around it where the land sinks back to inert ground potential.
<snip>
Geoff,
You didn't answer my question from my previous reply: does the article
imply or depict "expanding" equipotential rings around the downed
cable over time, thus implying some electro-chemical effect that
makes the area more dangerous over time?
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Arfa Daily
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- References:
- O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Arfa Daily
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Arfa Daily
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Smitty Two
- Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- From: Arfa Daily
- O.T. Step Potential ...
- Prev by Date: Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- Next by Date: Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- Previous by thread: Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- Next by thread: Re: O.T. Step Potential ...
- Index(es):