Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: glenzabr@xxxxxxxxxxxx (GMAN)
- Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 19:15:46 GMT
In article <lIQ9k.7532$r_2.4184@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, UCLAN <nomail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
GMAN wrote:But technically does it do a better job or is the firmware and its capabilities
buyI guess to me the only advantage with the C801D is the 8 cell capacity? The
drawback is not car charging.
And the extra cost. Main question is do you *need* an 8-cell charger? If so,
get the C801D, and get a cheaper charger for the car. The heavy duty power
supply for the C801 is nice. I used to have a MH-C808M charger that had the
same type of supply. The C801 is the Cadillac of chargers, no doubt, but
unless you need the 8-cell capacity, I'd go with the C9000.
Good suggestion, then if i needed more capacity i could just in the future
a second one.
One more consideration: The C801 and its power supply require about FOUR
times more bench space than does the C9000.
very similar to the C9000?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: UCLAN
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- References:
- NiMH cell charging
- From: Engineer
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: Dave Platt
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: Engineer
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: 1PW
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: Dave Platt
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: William Sommerwerck
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: Engineer
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: UCLAN
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: GMAN
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: UCLAN
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: GMAN
- Re: NiMH cell charging
- From: UCLAN
- NiMH cell charging
- Prev by Date: Re: NiMH cell charging
- Next by Date: Re: Do power supplies in shut down come on briefly?
- Previous by thread: Re: NiMH cell charging
- Next by thread: Re: NiMH cell charging
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading