Re: Radio Shack?
- From: "Radiosrfun" <Radiosrfun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:22:15 -0500
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4592A8E1.3E4FA222@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jim Douglas wrote:
I believe more folks would know it as DB-9 than the "correct" name!
And that is the problem. The "Dumbing down" of the entire world.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Michael, I'll disagree with you to a small degree. IF it is a DE 9 - then
the FACTORY should label it as such. It is not any harder to learn a part as
DE 9 as it would be a DB 9. The "FACTORIES" are at fault for
misrepresentation. You can't expect the general public to know other than
what they're taught. Ignorance breeds ignorance.
Lou
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Karl Uppiano
- Re: Radio Shack?
- References:
- Radio Shack?
- From: Paul Bunion
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Alison
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Alison
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Jim Douglas
- Re: Radio Shack?
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Radio Shack?
- Prev by Date: Repair instructions for APC Back-UPS RS 500
- Next by Date: Re: Radio Shack?
- Previous by thread: Re: Radio Shack?
- Next by thread: Re: Radio Shack?
- Index(es):