Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis
From: Baby Elian (SPAM)_at_virgilio.it)
Date: 06/14/04
- Next message: Baby Elian: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- In reply to: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Next in thread: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Reply: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 17:33:34 GMT
"Don Lancaster" <don@tinaja.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:40CDE038.35CACEB8@tinaja.com...
> brianb wrote:
> >
> > Someone mentioned there is a process to split or "crack" hydrogen from
> > water using heat, I guess, instead of a electrolysis. Which is more
> > efficient?
>
> Methane reformation.
No,it's wrong.Methane reformation is not "from water"
- Next message: Baby Elian: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- In reply to: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Next in thread: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Reply: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading