Re: nuclear separation of hydrogen from water vs. electrolysis

From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic20_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 06/14/04 

Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:04:12 GMT

Don Lancaster wrote:
> Baby Elian wrote:
>
>>"Don Lancaster" <don@tinaja.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
>>news:40CDE038.35CACEB8@tinaja.com...
>>
>>>brianb wrote:
>>>
>>>>Someone mentioned there is a process to split or "crack" hydrogen from
>>>>water using heat, I guess, instead of a electrolysis. Which is more
>>>>efficient?
>>>
>>>Methane reformation.
>>
>>No,it's wrong.Methane reformation is not "from water"
>
>
> Not nearly as wrong as creating hydrogen by electyrolysis or heat.

Sure it is. Why waste a perfectly good hydrocarbon fuel to make
hydrogen? If/when the day comes we need to process the sand and tar oils
of North America, the hydrogen won't come from methane. We don't have a
surplus of the stuff. On the other hand, we have plenty of nuclear fuel.

Best, Dan. 

-- 
http://lakeweb.net
http://ReserveAnalyst.com
No EXTRA stuff for email.
Loading