Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside
From: Joe S. (nobody_at_nowhere.net)
Date: 06/20/04
- Next message: Psalm 110: "Michael Moore aims to expose in 'Fahrenheit 9/11'"
- Previous message: Parallax: "Re: Madonna Urges Her Fans To See Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 9/11'"
- In reply to: Parallax: "Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 22:05:50 -0400
It's a movie. Get over it. Don't want to see it? Don't.
-- ----- Joe S. "Parallax" <dbohara@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:792abaf9.0406191745.d25eadc@posting.google.com... > "ClassWarz" <Outsourced@AmercanWorker.Com> wrote in message news:<10d7i0e4b235uef@corp.supernews.com>... > > "Psalm 110" <Melchizedek@USA.com> wrote in message > > news:2275a3c5.0406181853.538066d0@posting.google.com... > > > http://www.iht.com/articles/525560.html > > > > > > Fact-checking Moore's political broadside > > > > > > Philip Shenon/NYT The New York Times > > > > > > Friday, June 18, 2004 > > > Viewer finds Moore 'on firm ground' > > > > > > LOS ANGELES Michael Moore is not coy about his hopes for "Fahrenheit > > > 9/11," his blistering documentary attack on President George W. Bush > > > and the war in Iraq. He wants it to be remembered as the first > > > big-audience, election-year film that helped unseat a president. > > > . > > > "And it's not just a hope," the Oscar-winning filmmaker said in a > > > phone interview last week, describing focus groups in Michigan in > > > April at which, after seeing the movie, previously undecided voters > > > expressed eagerness to defeat Bush. > > > . > > > "We found that if you entered the theater on the fence, you fell off > > > it somewhere during those two hours," he said. "It ignites a fire in > > > people who had given up." The movie's indictment of Bush is nothing if > > > not sprawling. Moore suggests that Bush and his administration > > > jeopardized national security in an effort to placate Bush family > > > cronies in Saudi Arabia, that the White House helped members of Osama > > > bin Laden's family to flee the United States after the attacks of > > > Sept. 11, 2001, and that the administration manipulated terrorism > > > alert levels to scare Americans into supporting the invasion of Iraq. > > > . > > > Moore's previous films generated a cottage industry of conservative > > > commentators eager to prove sloppiness and exaggeration in his films; > > > a handful of mainstream critics have also found flaws. But if > > > "Fahrenheit 9/11" attracts the audience Moore and his distributors are > > > predicting, Moore may face an onslaught of fact-checking unlike > > > anything he - or any other documentary filmmaker - has ever > > > experienced. After all, White House officials and the Bush family > > > began impugning the film even before any of them had seen it. > > > . > > > So how will Moore's movie stand up under close examination? Is the > > > film's depiction of Bush as a lazy and duplicitous leader, blinded by > > > his family's financial ties to Arab moneymen and the Saudi Arabian > > > royal family, true to fact? Moore and his distributors refused to > > > circulate copies of the film and its script before the film's release > > > on Friday; his production team said recently there was no final script > > > because the film was still undergoing minor editing - for clarity, > > > they said, not accuracy. > > > . > > > After a year spent covering the U.S. commission investigating the > > > Sept. 11 attacks, I was recently allowed to attend a Hollywood > > > screening. Based on that single viewing, and after separating out what > > > is clearly presented as Moore's opinion from what is stated as fact, > > > it seems safe to say that central assertions of fact in "Fahrenheit > > > 9/11" are supported by the public record. > > > . > > > Moore is on firm ground in arguing that the Bushes, like many > > > prominent Texas families with oil interests, have profited handsomely > > > from their relationships with prominent Saudis, including members of > > > the royal family and of the large and fabulously wealthy bin Laden > > > clan, which has insisted it long ago disowned Osama. > > > . > > > Moore spends several minutes in the film documenting ties between the > > > president and James Bath, a financial adviser to a prominent member of > > > the bin Laden family who was an original investor in Bush's Arbusto > > > energy company and who served with the future president in the Air > > > National Guard in the early 1970s. The Bath friendship, which > > > indirectly links Bush to the family of the world's most notorious > > > terrorist, has been well documented. > > > . > > > Moore charges that Bush and his aides paid too little attention to > > > warnings in the summer of 2001 that Al Qaeda was about to attack, > > > including a detailed Aug. 6, 2001, CIA briefing that warned of > > > terrorism within the United States. In its final report next month, > > > the Sept. 11 commission can be expected to offer support to this > > > assertion. Moore says that instead of focusing on Al Qaeda, the > > > president spent 42 percent of his first eight months in office on > > > vacation; the figure came not from a conspiracy-hungry Web site but > > > from a calculation by The Washington Post. The most valid criticisms > > > of the film are likely to involve the artful way that Moore connects > > > the facts, and whether he has left out others that might undermine his > > > scalding attack. A great many statistics fly by in the movie - like > > > assertions that 6 percent to 7 percent of America is owned by Saudi > > > Arabians, and that Saudi companies have paid more than $1.4 billion to > > > Bush family interests. Moore and his team say they have news reports > > > and other evidence to back up the numbers, and that it will be posted > > > on his site, www.michaelmoore.com, after the release of the > > > documentary. Moore may also be criticized for the way he portrays the > > > evacuation of the extended bin Laden family from the United States > > > after Sept. 11. As the Sept. 11 commission has found, the Saudi > > > government was able to pull strings at senior levels of the Bush > > > administration to help the bin Ladens leave the United States. But > > > while the film clearly suggests that the flights occurred at a time > > > when all air traffic was grounded immediately after the attacks ("Even > > > Ricky Martin couldn't fly," Moore says over video of the singer > > > wandering in an airport lobby), the Sept. 11 commission said in a > > > report this April that there was "no credible evidence that any > > > chartered flights of Saudi Arabian nationals departed the United > > > States before the reopening of national airspace," and that the FBI > > > had concluded that no one aboard the flights was involved in Sept. 11. > > > . > > > Moore defended the scene, saying his goal was to show how the White > > > House was eager to bend and break the rules for Saudi friends, in this > > > case the extended family of the terrorist who had just brought down > > > the twin towers of the World Trade Center and attacked the Pentagon. > > > And as reporters have found, the White House still refuses to document > > > fully how the flights were arranged. "I don't want to get lost in the > > > forest because of a single tree," Moore said. "The main point I want > > > people to go away with is that these people got special treatment > > > because they were bin Ladens or Saudi royals, and you and I would > > > never have been given that treatment." > > > . > > > Moore is readying for a conservative counterattack, saying he has > > > created a "war room" to offer an instant response to any assault on > > > the film's credibility. He has retained Chris Lehane, a Democratic > > > Party strategist known as a master of the black art of "oppo," or > > > opposition research, used to discredit detractors. He also hired > > > outside fact-checkers, led by a former general counsel of The New > > > Yorker and a veteran member of that magazine's legendary fact-checking > > > team, to vet the film. And he is threatening to go one step further, > > > saying he has consulted with lawyers who can bring defamation suits > > > against anyone who maligns the film or damages his reputation. "Any > > > attempts to libel me will be met by force," Moore said. "The most > > > important thing we have is truth on our side. If they persist in > > > telling lies, knowingly telling a lie with malice, then I'll take them > > > to court." > > > . > > > Joanne Doroshow, a public interest lawyer and filmmaker who shared in > > > a 1993 Oscar for documentaries and who joined the fact-checking effort > > > last month, said, "We have gone through every single word of this film > > > - literally every word - and verified its accuracy." That said, > > > Moore's fact-checkers said they did not view the film as straight > > > reporting. "This is an Op-Ed piece, it's not a news report," said Dev > > > Chatillon, the former general counsel for The New Yorker, adding, "The > > > facts have to be right, yes, but this is an individual's view of > > > current events. And I'm a very firm believer that it is within > > > everybody's right to examine the actions of their government." > > > . > > > Besides, it may turn out that the most talked-about moments in the > > > film are the least impeachable. For the White House, the most > > > devastating segment of "Fahrenheit 9/11" may be the video of a > > > befuddled-looking Bush staying put for nearly seven minutes at a > > > Florida elementary school on the morning of Sept. 11, continuing to > > > read a copy of "My Pet Goat" to schoolchildren even after an aide has > > > told him that a second plane has struck the twin towers. > > > . > > > Bush's slow, hesitant reaction to the disastrous news has never been a > > > secret. But seeing the actual footage, with the minutes ticking by, > > > may prove more damaging to the White House than all the statistics in > > > the world. > > > > Moore said on the Letterman Show tonight that he gets a lot of his facts > > from the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times. > > > > I've seen all the Moore films--Bowling eight times! -- and I find Moore uses > > stuff that ought to be common knowledge to most of us. > > > > But here comes the Republican Dirty Tricks Machine: > > > > http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php > > > > //begin quote > > > > Some People Still Don't Want You To See My Movie... From Michael Moore > > > > Friends, > > > > We're a week away from the nationwide opening of "Fahrenheit 9/11" and not a > > day goes by where we don't have some new battle to fight thanks to those who > > are still working overtime to keep people from seeing this film. What's > > their problem? Are they worried about something? > > > > A Republican PR firm has formed a fake grassroots front group called "Move > > America Forward" to harass and intimidate theater owners into not showing > > "Fahrenheit 9/11." These are the same people who successfully badgered CBS > > into canceling the Reagan mini-series a few months ago. And they are > > spending a ton of money this week to threaten movie theaters who even think > > about showing our movie. > > > > As of this morning, a little over 500 theaters have agreed to show the movie > > beginning next Friday, June 25. There are three national/regional theater > > chains who, as of today, have not booked the movie in their theaters. One > > theater owner in Illinois has reported receiving death threats. > > > > The right wing usually wins these battles. Their basic belief system is > > built on censorship, repression, and keeping people ignorant. They want to > > limit or snuff out any debate or dissension. They also don't like pets and > > are mean to small children. Too many of them are named "Fred." > > > > This new nut group is the Right's last hope in limiting how many people can > > see this movie. All of their other efforts have failed. Let's recap: > > > > 1. Roger Friedman at FOX News reported that the head of the company which > > first agreed to fund our film "got calls from Republican friends" pressuring > > them to back out. And they did. But... Miramax immediately picked up the > > film! Except... > > > > 2. Michael Eisner, the chairman of Disney, then blocked Miramax (a company > > owned by Disney) from releasing the film once it was finished. But... public > > attention and embarrassment forced Disney to let the Weinstein brothers of > > Miramax find another distributor! But... > > > > 3. Instead of a new distributor stepping right in -- as all the media > > predicted would happen -- it took another month to find distributors who > > would take on this movie. A number of other distributors, thanks to various > > pressures, were afraid to get involved. It looked for a while that we would > > be distributing this ourselves. But then Lions Gate and IFC Films rode in to > > the rescue! > > > > So, we have beaten back all attempts to kill this movie, and the only thing > > in the way of you now seeing "Fahrenheit 9/11" is this Republican big-money > > front group trying to force theaters not to show the movie. > > > > Please, contact your local theaters and let them know you want to see > > "Fahrenheit 9/11." Tell them that some people don't know that this is > > America and that we believe in freedom of speech and the importance of ALL > > voices being heard. (The members of MoveOn.org-an ACTUAL grassroots > > organization-have done a very cool thing. They are pledging to send a > > message to theater owners and are planning to attend a showing of the film > > on its opening weekend.) > > > > I appreciate their efforts, but you don't have to be a member of MoveOn to > > help stop this effort to keep "Fahrenheit 9/11" from making it to screens > > across the country. If a theater in your area is planning to show the film, > > just give them a call and thank them for standing up for the freedom of > > speech. If your local theater isn't showing the film, call them and let them > > know that you would like to see it and you'd like them to show it. > > > > The White House and their minions in our media have presented one distorted > > version of the truth after another for the past four years. All we are > > asking for is the right to show what they HAVEN'T shown us, the real truth. > > The truth that ain't pretty (and is, sadly, damningly hilarious). > > > > On top of all this, the MPAA gave the film an "R" rating. I want all > > teenagers to see this film. There is nothing in the film in terms of > > violence that we didn't see on TV every night at the dinner hour during the > > Vietnam War. Of course, that's the point, isn't it? The media have given the > > real footage from Iraq a "cleansing" -- made it look nice, easy to digest. > > Mario Cuomo has offered to be our lawyer in appealing this ruling by the > > MPAA. Frankly, I would like to think the MPAA is saying that the actions by > > the Bush administration are so abhorrent and revolting, we need to protect > > our children from seeing what they have done. In that case, the film should > > be rated NC-17! > > > > However it turns out, I trust all of you teenagers out there will find your > > way into a theater to see this movie. If the government believes it is OK to > > send slightly older teenagers to their deaths in Iraq, I think at the very > > least you should be allowed to see what they are going to draft you for in a > > couple of years. > > > > Finally, some very sophisticated individuals have been hacking into and > > shutting down our website. It is an hourly fight to keep it up. We are going > > to find out who is doing this and we are going to pursue a criminal > > prosecution. I'm preparing lots of cool stuff for the site so watch for new > > items on it next week (www.fahrenheit911.com and www.michaelmoore.com). > > > > Thanks again for your support and I hope to see you at the movies on opening > > night, June 25. > > > > Yours, > > > > Michael Moore > > > > PS. I am sponsoring a number of benefits around the country next week for > > local and national peace and justice groups, including Military Families > > Speak Out and September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows. Please check > > your local papers and my website next week for further details. > > > > PPS. Also, I am going to be on the "Late Show with David Letterman" on > > Friday night. It's on CBS at 11:35 PM Eastern and Pacific. And on Monday > > morning (June 21) I will be on "The Today Show" on NBC. Next week, Jon > > Stewart and Conan. I'd go on O'Reilly but, like a coward, he walked out on a > > screening we invited him to (with Al Franken just a few rows away!). I > > personally caught him sneaking out. Embarrassed, he tried to change the > > subject. He said, "When are you coming on my show?" and I said, "Turn around > > and watch the rest of the movie and I will come on your show." He walked > > out. Fair and balanced. > > > > //end quote > > > > > > > > CLASSWARZ > > > > > > > . > > > So now Moore believes a company is obligated to show his movie even if > they or their customers do not like it? It took Moore over a month to > find a distributor, big deal, sounds like distributors were afraid it > would bomb at the box office as most propaganda movies do. Moore now > admits to lying about the Bin Ladens leaving the US after 9/11. Whats > Moore going to do now, sue me for being critical of him? Typical > leftie lover of "freedom".
- Next message: Psalm 110: "Michael Moore aims to expose in 'Fahrenheit 9/11'"
- Previous message: Parallax: "Re: Madonna Urges Her Fans To See Michael Moore's 'Fahrenheit 9/11'"
- In reply to: Parallax: "Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside"
- Next in thread: Vendicar Decarian: "Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|