Re: Renewable energy alternative
From: Glenn (r8ulo_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: Jim Blair: "Re: Maine moves to cut greenhouse gases"
- Previous message: Crazy ***: "Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside"
- In reply to: Gun Woman: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Next in thread: Karl Johanson: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Reply: Karl Johanson: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Reply: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Reply: danny: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:08:25 GMT
So how do you plan to reason with eternally toxic waste?
And better question ... Why would you when you could develop renewable
energy that does not burden a thousand generations with your waste?
Glenn
Gun Woman wrote:
> "Steve Spence" <sspence@green-trust.org> wrote :
>
>
>>Oh, sure, replace one nightmare with another.
>
>
> If being anti-nuke is a religion to you, you won't listen to reasoning.
>
- Next message: Jim Blair: "Re: Maine moves to cut greenhouse gases"
- Previous message: Crazy ***: "Re: Fact-checking Moore's political broadside"
- In reply to: Gun Woman: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Next in thread: Karl Johanson: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Reply: Karl Johanson: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Reply: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Reply: danny: "Re: Renewable energy alternative"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]