Re: Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics
From: James (jrapier_at_dcr.net)
Date: 06/25/04
- Next message: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics"
- Previous message: James: "Re: Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics"
- Maybe in reply to: Psalm 110: "Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:50:01 -0400
"Scott and/or Janet Storm" <bstorm1@@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:v_LCc.113137$0y.27873@attbi_s03...
>
> "James" <jrapier@dcr.net> wrote in message news:q2BCc.764
>
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > That's true and the context in which any truth that is there can be
> > propaganda. Lies or rumors mixed with truth are lies and can also be
> > considered propaganda. The thrust of the piece is propaganda and by
> > definition must contain lies.
> >
> > Propaganda:
> > information, ideas, or rumors deliberately spread widely to help or harm
a
> > person, group, movement, institution, nation, etc.
> >
>
> Oh for ***'s sake. Go buy a Webster's abridged.
> >
Actually that was Webster's unabridged.
- Next message: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics"
- Previous message: James: "Re: Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics"
- Maybe in reply to: Psalm 110: "Fahrenheit 9/11 is hot, hot, hot rave critics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]