Re: Hydrogen economy will never exist

From: william mook (william.mook_at_mokindustries.com)
Date: 07/13/04 

Date: 13 Jul 2004 16:03:32 -0700

Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote in message news:<40F3F7AC.FD04F625@tinaja.com>...
> Fred Kasner wrote:
> >
> > In sci.energy.hydrogen william mook <william.mook@mokindustries.com> wrote:
> > > Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote in message news:<40F0657F.33DEE89E@tinaja.com>...
> > >> Fred Kasner wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > ... snip ...
> > >> >
> > >> > >> daestrom
> > >> >
>
> > > [snip]
>
> > >> Also, the value of the kilowatthours of energy in a battery is
> > >> ridiculously higher than the value of the kilowatt hours of energy in a
> > >> hot water heater.
>
> > > Exergy isn't a real word its just made up stuff that could be more
> > > easily and consistently explained using real words like entropy.
> >
> > "real words"? What the hell is a real word? If you mean a substantial readily
> > measurable and directly discernable quanitity then entropy does NOT fill that
> > bill. It can't be measured directly. It depends on multiple observations and
> > a following calculation. It is why it is not so easily comprehended by the
> > novice and by the general public. Exergy is no less comprehensible.
> > FK
> >
> > --
> > fkasner@sdf.lonestar.org
> > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
> Some ancient exergy bibliographies on the web have many tens of
> thousands of entries.
> Many more than that today, of course.
>
> See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf

The same can be said about bibliographies about UFOs, ghosts, and
other assorted bull***.

Lets look at a *real* reference shall we? Something like the CRC
Handbookof Chemistry and Physics 84th Edition

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0849304849/qid=1089759655/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/103-6646754-9799835?v=glance&s=books

It has absolutely NO references to 'EXERGY.' Sorry.

Quantcast