Re: Another Stanley Meyer Type Scam (was: Water-fueled car, in public domain, by 2005, sez Earth2012.org)

From: fkasner (fkasner_at_enteract.com)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:53:11 GMT

"If I told U I'd have 2 kill U" <knews4u2chew@yahoo.com> wrote in message >
> > And you talk about the questionable significance and accuracy od the

... snip ...

> You must know the difference between a chemical reaction and a
> nuclear reaction. A lot of people don't understand that but they like
> to argue a lot in every NG on Internet.
>
> In a chemical reaction you need a lot of current and some salt for
> making the water conductive.
>
> In a nuclear reaction you don't need any current at all, only high
> voltage. How much current you need in a real application depends
> on how clean your water is. As cleaner as better.
>
> Stanley Meyers method's have NOTHING to do with chemical
> reactions.
>
> HOW TO?
>
> As a guide, you need US Patent 4,936,961 ref. figure 1 to 3F.
>
> If you read something about magical frequencyis, forget that.
> It works fine with 10KHz or something else if you preferred.
> Use 50% duty cycle. BUT! the frequency will be doubled in the
> step up circuit and that's the frequency the Water-Cell will work
> with. The components must resist at least 2000V.
>
> The Water-Cell is very simple. Take a lot of stainless steel tubes
> with the inner diameter of the bigger tube 3mm bigger than the outer
> diameter of the inner tube. From now you must look at this
> Water-Cell as a capacitor with water as dilectricum.
>
> The Water-Cell and the INDUCTOR will resonate at a specific
> frequency. It's a normal RC-circuit.
>
> Now the most important: The Water-Cell/Inductor frequency and
> the doubled frequency from the generator must be exactly the
> same. A special condition exists in a L/C Circuit, when it is
> energized at a frequency at which the inductive reactance is equal
> to the capacitive reactance, XL = XC.
>
> Adjust the voltage peak level to reach a maximum hydrogen/oxygen
> producing with a minimum of current using. If you earlier make
> hydrogen with the electrolysis method with a lot of current,
> this experiment will really surprise you.
>
> For even less current you can make some experiment with a
> centertapped puls-transformer.
>
> Have a nice trip to Ohio!
>
> Ted!

The errors are so obvious that only an ignoramus can continue to flog this
dead hores over and over again.

The frequencies you claim that can dissociate the H to O bond are all
located in the infrared. As such they are a huge multiple of the AC
frequencies which you claim perform the work. With such a high multiple of
the fundamental how much energy can you claim would be in such a harmonic?
And don't try that stuff about repeated resonance stimulation. That's what
happens when light shines on water and it doesn't cause the bonds to break.

As for your hopeless confusion about a voltage being all that is needed to
impart energy to a process you have further demonstrated your ignorance. In
the field of the large energies of nuclear processes the energies (not
potentials!) are specified frequently in electron volts. You stupidly have
confused an electron volt (a product of charge and potential) that is is
equal to an energy with a volt which is not an energy at all but an energy
per unit charge (joule per coulomb). This means that your nonsense about
only needing a high voltage and not needind much if any current at all to
produce the needed energy is a snare and a delusion you have created for
yourself and which leads you down the path to a pit of total nonsense.

You all here a profound apology for your insulting behavior so based on
abysmal ignorance.
FK

Relevant Pages