Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?
From: Xen0gen (jrhall_at_impressiondelights.com)
Date: 07/29/04
- Next message: Don Lancaster: "Re: TOPPING $100 million: Fahrenheit 9/11 sets new documentary mark,"
- Previous message: Harry Conover: "Re: Another Stanley Meyer Type Scam (was: Water-fueled car, in public domain, by 2005, sez Earth2012.org)"
- In reply to: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?"
- Next in thread: Don Lancaster: "Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jul 2004 10:10:45 -0700
"Fred B. McGalliard" <frederick.b.mcgalliard@boeing.com> wrote in message news:<I1803B.Lt5@news.boeing.com>...
> "Bob Eldred" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1090439435.427516@news-1.nethere.net...
> ...
> > Furthermore production of methanol uses some of the energy in the carbon
> > when coal is the percursor. Using only the hydrogen wastes the carbon
> > component.
>
> When the coal is used as the only energy source, it makes no dif (ignoring
> some possible differences in efficiency)whether you produce H2 only or HxCx,
> you still use all the energy that was in the carbon. It is probably a better
> process from a CO2 perspective, to produce hydrogen from some alternative
> source, then use all the carbon in making a fuel oil, but in that case, you
> would not want to use the coal at all to make hydrogen. This would, of
> course, "waste" all the carbon in the coal, eh?
Anyone else seen the recent research about the PSII (photosynthesis
II) protein. I would assume that mass production of this protein, or a
simpler version tailored to our needs, could begin within the next
decade. This would provide the most fuel efficient set up I can think
of. You could have water stored in a tank (that's easy) and have a
panel on the roof of the car similar to a solar panel filled with the
protein and run water through it to get hydrogen. However the storage
of the separated components is still an issue.
here's a link to what I'm talking about:
http://www.reactivereports.com/37/37_1.html
- Next message: Don Lancaster: "Re: TOPPING $100 million: Fahrenheit 9/11 sets new documentary mark,"
- Previous message: Harry Conover: "Re: Another Stanley Meyer Type Scam (was: Water-fueled car, in public domain, by 2005, sez Earth2012.org)"
- In reply to: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?"
- Next in thread: Don Lancaster: "Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: Na + H2O2 (50%) -> H2?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|