Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!
From: Eric Gisin (ericgisin_at_graffiti.net)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- In reply to: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Next in thread: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Reply: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Reply: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 13:45:32 -0700
"Harry Conover" <hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:7ce4e226.0408111034.3f2ac06f@posting.google.com...
> "Duane C. Johnson" <redrok@redrok.com> wrote in message
news:<41198A54.2770C676@redrok.com>...
>
> > Energy mass conversion still happens even at this small scale.
>
> It has never been observed to happen. In any chemical or biochemical
> reaction, the mass of the reactants alway precisely equals the mass of
> the reaction products.
>
The mass change is probably too small to measure. Since chemical reactions are
millions times less powerful than fusion, chemical mass change is in parts per
billion.
I believe it is electrons that gain mass at higher energy levels.
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- In reply to: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Next in thread: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Reply: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Reply: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|