Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!
From: G. R. L. Cowan (gcowan_at_eagle.ca)
Date: 08/11/04
- Next message: Fritz Schlunder: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Previous message: Eric Gisin: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- In reply to: Eric Gisin: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Next in thread: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:39:25 -0400
Eric Gisin wrote:
>
> "Harry Conover" <hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:7ce4e226.0408111034.3f2ac06f@posting.google.com...
> > "Duane C. Johnson" <redrok@redrok.com> wrote in message
> news:<41198A54.2770C676@redrok.com>...
> >
> > > Energy mass conversion still happens even at this small scale.
> >
> > It has never been observed to happen. In any chemical or biochemical
> > reaction, the mass of the reactants alway precisely equals the mass of
> > the reaction products.
> >
> The mass change is probably too small to measure. Since chemical reactions are
> millions times less powerful than fusion, chemical mass change is in parts per
> billion.
Google ("Weighing chemical bonds").
--- Graham Cowan
http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.doc --
How individual mobility gains nuclear cachet
- Next message: Fritz Schlunder: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Previous message: Eric Gisin: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- In reply to: Eric Gisin: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Next in thread: Harry Conover: "Re: E <=> MC^2 generally ...and also inside living things!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
