Re: No Current Consumed /Nuclear Reaction

From: If I told U I'd have 2 kill U (knews4u2chew_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 08/27/04 

Date: 26 Aug 2004 21:31:05 -0700

Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com> wrote in message news:<412E12DA.421CCED1@tinaja.com>...
> Don Kelly wrote:
> >
> > Don't substitute gobbledegook such as the above for hard data or reasonable
> > response to criticism, which is really quite gentle compared to that that is
> > given to any new idea in a scientific forum (which this isn't)

There's a mouthful.

>-this is
> > standard procedure - the onus on you is to provide proof.

Working on it.
Won't stop.
Not intested in talking to anyone who isn't.

> > You haven't tried. Neither did Meyer.
> >
Meyer didn't have to make his data public.
He knew what it could do as did the patent examiners who inspected his
cell under Sec 101 of the PTO.
He was not interested in anyone's "scientific' stamp of approval.
He was soley interested in staying alive long enough to bring his work
to the world while protecting it.
He's dead and that is a fact.
BUT HE DID SHOW SOMEONE IN SRI LANKA JUST HOW IT IS DONE BECAUSE HE
WANTED THE POOREST COUNTRIES WITHOUT ENERGY OR CLEAN WATER TO HAVE IT
IF HE NEVER GOT HIS MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.

> > --
> > Don Kelly
> --- George Washington
>
>
>
> To produce hydrogen gas from water, an electron needs moved.

Who said you don't?

> Moving an electron is an electric current.
>
The way you do it maybe.

What is evidence of current?
What reaction?
What inaction?
What do you loose?
What do you gain?
Where does the electron go?
Does it disappear?
Does it remain an electron?
is it still moving when it is released?
What if it doesn't loose anything when released?
Does it slow down?
Does it speed up?
Is it a particle?
Is it a wave?

> Faraday's law ain't broke.
>
> See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/bashpseu.pdf and
> http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun/pdf

Right.
Don't forget the plug and the propaganda.
Sheesh.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: No Current Consumed /Nuclear Reaction
    ... >> Don't substitute gobbledegook such as the above for hard data or reasonable ... WANTED THE POOREST COUNTRIES WITHOUT ENERGY OR CLEAN WATER TO HAVE IT ... > To produce hydrogen gas from water, an electron needs moved. ... What if it doesn't loose anything when released? ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: No Current Consumed /Nuclear Reaction
    ... > WANTED THE POOREST COUNTRIES WITHOUT ENERGY OR CLEAN WATER TO HAVE IT ... >> To produce hydrogen gas from water, an electron needs moved. ... >> Moving an electron is an electric current. ... > What if it doesn't loose anything when released? ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: No Current Consumed /Nuclear Reaction
    ... > WANTED THE POOREST COUNTRIES WITHOUT ENERGY OR CLEAN WATER TO HAVE IT ... >> To produce hydrogen gas from water, an electron needs moved. ... >> Moving an electron is an electric current. ... > What if it doesn't loose anything when released? ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: No Current Consumed /Nuclear Reaction
    ... > Don't substitute gobbledegook such as the above for hard data or reasonable ... > response to criticism, which is really quite gentle compared to that that is ... Moving an electron is an electric current. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: No Current Consumed /Nuclear Reaction
    ... > Don't substitute gobbledegook such as the above for hard data or reasonable ... > response to criticism, which is really quite gentle compared to that that is ... Moving an electron is an electric current. ...
    (sci.energy)