Re: Cellulosic Ethanol
From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic20_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Energy Protectionism"
- Previous message: robert luis rabello: "Re: Energy Protectionism"
- In reply to: Robert: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Next in thread: Robert: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Reply: Robert: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:05:12 GMT
Robert wrote:
>
> Just do the sums and see how much area you need.
> There is no way to replace fossils.
I come up with the heating value of oil, pumped per day world wide, at
3.5E17 exajoules. Sulfur-iodine at 50% packing gets you 1E7
exajoules/m2/day. 35,000 km2, less than 200 km on a side. (check my
numbers.)
So, why do you keep saying, 'No Way'?
Best, Dan.
-- http://lakeweb.net http://ReserveAnalyst.com No EXTRA stuff for email.
- Next message: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Energy Protectionism"
- Previous message: robert luis rabello: "Re: Energy Protectionism"
- In reply to: Robert: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Next in thread: Robert: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Reply: Robert: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
