Re: Cellulosic Ethanol
From: Robert (RB_at_..)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Previous message: robert luis rabello: "Re: Energy Protectionism"
- In reply to: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Next in thread: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Reply: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:13:03 GMT
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 17:05:12 GMT, Dan Bloomquist <EXTRApublic20@lakeweb.com>
wrote:
>
>
>Robert wrote:
>>
>> Just do the sums and see how much area you need.
>> There is no way to replace fossils.
>
>I come up with the heating value of oil, pumped per day world wide, at
>3.5E17 exajoules. Sulfur-iodine at 50% packing gets you 1E7
>exajoules/m2/day. 35,000 km2, less than 200 km on a side. (check my
>numbers.)
Tell me how your process works.
>
>So, why do you keep saying, 'No Way'?
>
>Best, Dan.
- Next message: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Previous message: robert luis rabello: "Re: Energy Protectionism"
- In reply to: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Next in thread: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Reply: Dan Bloomquist: "Re: Cellulosic Ethanol"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
