Re: Stop saying "energy carrier"!
From: K. Jones (shadetree1999_at_hotmailNODAMNSPAM.com)
Date: 09/26/04
- Next message: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Viable hydrogen vehicle by 2010"
- Previous message: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Viable hydrogen vehicle by 2010"
- In reply to: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Stop saying "energy carrier"!"
- Next in thread: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Stop saying "energy carrier"!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:20:57 -0400
"Tkalbfus1" <tkalbfus1@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040926001216.19398.00004700@mb-m17.aol.com...
> >Well, it's an element, not exactly a synfuel. Granted, a very expensive
> >element ...
> >
> >
>
> No actually its quite common, usually on Earth it comes with something
else
> attached.
The "comes with something else attached" is generally what makes it so
expensive.
(note he said expensive, not "common")
K. Jones
- Next message: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Viable hydrogen vehicle by 2010"
- Previous message: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Viable hydrogen vehicle by 2010"
- In reply to: Tkalbfus1: "Re: Stop saying "energy carrier"!"
- Next in thread: Fred B. McGalliard: "Re: Stop saying "energy carrier"!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|