Re: Electrolysing Steam
From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: We must use TRITIUM instead of hydrogen!"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solar-hydrogen home power system?"
- In reply to: Say not the Struggle nought Availeth: "Re: Electrolysing Steam"
- Next in thread: Don Lancaster: "Re: Electrolysing Steam"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: Electrolysing Steam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:16:43 +0000 (UTC)
"Say not the Struggle nought Availeth" <nospam@nospam.net> wrote in
message news:pHydd.10676$6W4.2764@newssvr16.news.prodigy.com...
[snip]
> Well, I was talking about a bore-hole, ie an oil-well. Several
thousand
> feet down, not really possible to collect samples and then process
in lab.
>
> BTW, this is 1968 or so, I was a freshman in college at the time.
>
> Don't know if technology was used or not.
Do you mean that plain guesswork was involved?
> anyway, water molecules are polar, and naturally oriented to the
> magnetic field of the earth.
Nonsense.
>
> If I remember the frequency was 2.2 khz, could be wrong though.
The time you spent at College does not appear to have benefited you
in any direct way, judging by the nonsense you write.
Franz
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: We must use TRITIUM instead of hydrogen!"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solar-hydrogen home power system?"
- In reply to: Say not the Struggle nought Availeth: "Re: Electrolysing Steam"
- Next in thread: Don Lancaster: "Re: Electrolysing Steam"
- Reply: Don Lancaster: "Re: Electrolysing Steam"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
