Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion
From: Franz Heymann (notfranz.heymann_at_btopenworld.com)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective"
- In reply to: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Next in thread: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:08:07 +0000 (UTC)
"Thomas Lee Elifritz" <crackpots@everywhere.net> wrote in message
news:4184D01F.99E5C222@everywhere.net...
> October 31, 2004
>
> Franz Heymann wrote:
>
> > > Since the solar neutrino
> > > problem still persists, apparently we still have a ways to go
with
> > that understanding.
> >
> > I thought it was resolved when neutrino oscillation was observed ,
or
> > has there been a new problem since then?
>
> Apparently so. Which scenario of flavor oscillation is it, exactly?
I don't remember for certain, but it is most likely to have been e-mu
>
>
http://citebase.eprints.org/cgi-bin/citations?id=oai:arXiv.org:hep-ph/0206308
I have just reread the paper. I see no new problems with regard to
the solar neutrinos.
> Sterility is remarkable. Completely successful modifications to the
> standard model.
Would-be wise statements like that escape me.
If you were to say what you intended, but failed to convey, I might be
in a position to respond.
Franz
- Next message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Previous message: Franz Heymann: "Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective"
- In reply to: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Next in thread: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: Solid Hydrogen, Sonofusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]