Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective

From: Tum Gard (dragmit_at_adelphia.net)
Date: 11/01/04 

Date: 1 Nov 2004 10:47:13 -0800

I don't understand how someone who is so educated can accept the
circumstances involved with the use of nuclear fission science. If
the Romans were heating their bath water using nuclear fission, we
would still have about 150,000 years plus to babysit their waste. And
if we fail to keep this stuff under control, who knows how many people
would die? Just how smart is that??

Nuclear fission energy is not the answer to our energy problems, only
an awful, horrendous, ridiculous response akin to a knee jerk
reaction.

Think people, this stuff is dangerous! Some scientists pretend there
is no problem because it serves their own selfish missions!

Alex ... do you have some magical solution to this waste disposal I
haven't heard of yet? Cause if you do, I will gladly accept a science
that produces a 150,000 year life poison that is the primary element
for a dirty bomb, in a political atmosphere that allows extremists to
plow two civilian airplanes into a building in a major city. Damn!

Tim Gard

alexterrell@yahoo.com (Alex Terrell) wrote in message news:<d81e59c9.0411010230.2f570f1e@posting.google.com>...
snip

> According to General Atomics, preliminary laboratory work on
> thermochemical production should be complete by 2006. A 10MW pilot
> hydrogen plant using fossil heat would then be built, followed by
> nuclear thermochemical production by 2015.
>

Relevant Pages