Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective
From: Eric Gisin (ericgisin_at_graffiti.net)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Improving battery tech, was Re: peddling a scam ..."
- Previous message: Saint-Hilaire: "Re: Quasiturbine - Over unity air motor ?"
- In reply to: Tum Gard: "Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective"
- Next in thread: Alex Terrell: "Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 11:19:42 -0800
Typical anti-nuke hysteria. It is trivial to store it 1000 years.
"Tum Gard" <dragmit@adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:8a3547e5.0411011047.767684d@posting.google.com...
> I don't understand how someone who is so educated can accept the
> circumstances involved with the use of nuclear fission science. If
> the Romans were heating their bath water using nuclear fission, we
> would still have about 150,000 years plus to babysit their waste. And
> if we fail to keep this stuff under control, who knows how many people
> would die? Just how smart is that??
>
> Nuclear fission energy is not the answer to our energy problems, only
> an awful, horrendous, ridiculous response akin to a knee jerk
> reaction.
>
> Think people, this stuff is dangerous! Some scientists pretend there
> is no problem because it serves their own selfish missions!
>
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Improving battery tech, was Re: peddling a scam ..."
- Previous message: Saint-Hilaire: "Re: Quasiturbine - Over unity air motor ?"
- In reply to: Tum Gard: "Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective"
- Next in thread: Alex Terrell: "Re: Using nuclear power to make renewables and a hydrogen economy cost effective"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
