Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?
From: Don Lancaster (don_at_tinaja.com)
Date: 01/07/05
- Next message: Peter Lowrie: "Re: try"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: try"
- In reply to: William Mook: "Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?"
- Next in thread: William Mook: "Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?"
- Reply: William Mook: "Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:12:10 -0700
William Mook wrote:
>
> Yes. Let's say that you're 80% efficient in getting hydrogen from
> electricity and you're 80% efficient in getting electricity from
> hydrogen. That's 64% overall. Let's say there are transmission and
> storage losses, so that you only get half as much energy after fooling
> around with hydrogen.
>
Absurd assumptions.
The latest IJHE paper shows a round trip
electricity--->hydrogen---->electricity net exergy of 13 percent, a
figure which almost certainly is a ludicrously high overestimation.
That figure is before fully burdened amortization.
There ALWAYS will be more intelligent things to do with electricity than
destroying its value in a hydrogen fantasy.
See http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf
-- Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552 voice: (928)428-4073 email: don@tinaja.com Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
- Next message: Peter Lowrie: "Re: try"
- Previous message: Don Lancaster: "Re: try"
- In reply to: William Mook: "Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?"
- Next in thread: William Mook: "Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?"
- Reply: William Mook: "Re: attn: William Mook - How is your company doing?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|