Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming.
From: Michael Davis (mdavis19_at_ix.netcom.com)
Date: 01/17/05
- Next message: JohnnyCJohnny: "Re: Cold Fusion Nanotech Breakthrough - Respected Japanese Scientist Quietly Claims a First"
- Previous message: Peter Lowrie: "Re: This NG sucks"
- In reply to: knews4u2chew_at_yahoo.com: "Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming."
- Next in thread: Jon Danniken: "Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:41:58 -0500
knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
> Bill Ward wrote:
>
>>On 16 Jan 2005 16:02:05 -0800, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Bill Ward wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 16 Jan 2005 11:45:48 -0800, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Bill Ward wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 16 Jan 2005 11:16:27 -0800, knews4u2chew@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.spiritofmaat.com/announce/ann_dryice.htm
>>>
>>><snip worthless tactics>
>>>
>>>Here I did it for you Mr. "Science."
>>>
>>>"polar ice melt"
>>
>>http://www.google.com/search?tab=gw&q=%22polar%20ice%20melt%22&hl=en&
>>
>>>Try reading before you post disinfo so fast as to not even have had
>>>time to read the cited article.
>>
>>That was a Google search, and one of the first hits was:
>>
>>http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/wea00/wea00166.htm
>>
>>In that I found:
>>
>>[Begin quote]
>>Global warming, if it is indeed occurring, has been slight
>>so far. I say "if it is indeed
>>occurring", because the ability to measure
>>surface and upper atmospheric temperatures over the past
>>hundred years or so and our understanding
>>of how to average the temperatures from measurement stations
>>over that period is still debated and
>>being investigated. A slight warming trend appears
>>to have occurred over the past 100 years, although most of
>>that has occurred since World War II and
>>especially since the early 1980s. Whether this has been
>>caused by man or is part of a natural
>>cycle (or perhaps both) remains to be shown.
>>
>>Recent data suggest that the polar ice has not decreased as
>>at first thought, but, for the North
>>pole in particular, may have slightly thinned due to a
>>natural cycle. This requires more study.
>>The ice cap on Greenland has not changed in total amount,
>>but in extent, having increased in
>>thickness in the central part of the island while decreasing
>>in depth near the coast. Some
>>glaciers are decreasing in some areas of the world, but are
>>increasing in others. There is a
>>lot of seemingly contradictory information that has yet to
>>be sorted out in the global climate
>>change picture.
>>[End quote]
>>
>>I'm not going to get in a battle of wits with an unarmed
>>person, I'm just showing you that there is more to the issue
>>than you apparently realize. A Google search is a pointer
>>to potential references, not a reference in itself. Try
>>actually reading and understanding the references you post.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Bill Ward
>
>
>
> Wait a sec.
> You use a government website as a "credible" source under the "Bush
> Administration" of what is happening with regards climate chamge and
> global warming?
It's a hellofalot more credible than any of the paranoid drivel you have
presented, Jr. Dummy.
>
> This would be the same government that totally rejects the opinion of
> the 500 plus scientists that wrote a letter to Bush warning him of
> climate change?
If they had any hard evidence, they wouldn't be presenting mere
opinions. Opinions are meaningless, no matter who they belong to.
>
> Surely you jest?
>
> Ahahahahahahaha.
Crazed, maniacal, laughter noted, kook.
Tell us, Jr. Dummy, is there any crazy conspiracy theory or loony
TEOTWAWKI scenerio you don't buy into hook, line and sinker?
-- The Evil Michael Davis(tm) http://www.mdpub.com/scopeworks/ http://skepticult.org Member #264-70198-536 Member #33 1/3 of The "I Have Been Killfiled By Tommy" Club "There's a sucker born every minute" - David Hannum (often erroneously attributed to P. T. Barnum)
- Next message: JohnnyCJohnny: "Re: Cold Fusion Nanotech Breakthrough - Respected Japanese Scientist Quietly Claims a First"
- Previous message: Peter Lowrie: "Re: This NG sucks"
- In reply to: knews4u2chew_at_yahoo.com: "Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming."
- Next in thread: Jon Danniken: "Re: But There Ain't No Global Warming."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
