Re: Don was saying...

From: John Larkin (jjSNIPlarkin_at_highTHISlandPLEASEtechnology.XXX)
Date: 01/21/05 

Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:58:20 -0800

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:54:24 -0700, Don Lancaster <don@tinaja.com>
wrote:

>TCS wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:33:03 -0800, John Larkin <jjSNIPlarkin@highTHISlandPLEASEtechnology.XXX> wrote:
>> >On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:39:36 -0800, "Bob Eldred"
>> ><nsmontassoc@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> So i am still adrift in this sea of electrolysis anomalies and I'm afraid
>> >>my
>> >>> pea sized brain is unable to fathom the reasons why, and moreover, what on
>> >>> earth the Guru means when he states that Ohms Theory is not applicable
>> >>> therein.
>>
>> >Ohm said that current increases linearly with applied voltage. It
>> >doesn't.
>>
>> It does for a fixed resistance. If current isn't increasing linearly then
>> you're not dealing with a fixed resistance.
>
>There are --> no <-- fixed resistances.
>The current --> never <-- increases linearly,
>Hence the law is bogus.
>
>Only the degree of the bogusity varies with the situation.

I = (E/R) * (1 + f(B,t,T))

John

Quantcast